An article that gave all the details, regarding a personal injury claim for a dog bite would require more space that what has been allowed for this article. Every state and province has its own statute of limitations, regarding the victim’s deadline for filing a personal injury claim. Moreover, that statute of limitations could have a toll.
What is a toll, and why is it used?
A toll is a pause in the span of time that the legal system has chosen to keep track of. There is usually a pause in the limitations span, if the dog’s owner leaves the state or province. At that point, the statute of limitations tolls, until the owner returns. The victim cannot sue the owner while he or she remains outside of the state or province where the biting incident took place.
Other than meeting the statute of limitations, what other challenges could the victim of a dog bite face?
If the person that was supposed to be controlling the biting canine did not carry homeowner’s insurance, then that could be a problem. The bitten man or woman would need to obtain coverage through a health insurance policy. Understand that the person walking a canine is not always that same dog’s owner.
If a canine pet in a home bit a service provider, such as a computer technician, then that victim might be self-employed. When that is the case, the victim’s greatest challenge could concern the presentation of evidence that did a good job of illustrating the amount of money that the victim lost, while recovering from the injury.
What challenges might a dog’s owner face?
Someone with a pet canine could become the target of a lawsuit for something other than a bite. If that pet pushed someone, causing him or her to fall down, or if that pet threatened someone and hurt them, then the victim could sue the pet’s owner with the help of a Personal Injury Lawyer in Hamilton. The owner of a pet cannot use any physical force against the victim, even if the victim tries to employ some form of defense. That was shown by the results of the case in which a bitten victim tried using pepper spray, and the dog’s owner took aggressive action against the spray-user.
Kindness towards an animal could cause a person or organization to get categorized as owners. Then if the same animal acts violently towards others, the kind-hearted person or organization could become the target of a lawsuit. Of course, a demonstration of kindness towards animals does not remove from any adult the need to maintain a duty of care towards both adults and children. In the eyes of the law, the absence of a readiness to assume responsibility for such a duty qualifies as negligence.